Thursday, 16 January 2014

Restrained writing

(I don't write these formidable nuisances very often: here is a poem that is restricted to all words possessing the vowel 'e' and syllable count matching.)

Green


The freeze here ends: green seeds embedded


The seeds germinate: slender stems erect.                                         

Fresh sweet flowerets emerge. Perfect.                                               

Trees see green anew: unseen bees merry below.                             

Behold the earth’s green: explore the splendid scene.                      

The leaves then fell beneath feet.  Deceased.                                    

We need greens return.                                                                           

Thursday, 9 January 2014

micro fiction + weird prose poetry

Micro/Twitter Fiction

(6 words) Vodka Night. Condom split. ‘Oh shit!’

 (120 characters) I searched my wife’s browser history. Google search results: ‘How to enjoy a small penis.’ I think my wife is cheating on me!

 (120 characters) I visited a brothel on my stag night. My father in-law knows. But he won’t say anything because he came too.

 (120 characters) Fired from work today. The tranny belched at a table nearby. ‘That wasn’t very lady like’, I just couldn’t help myself.

 Prose poetry
‘Mortuary mounting at 8’, read the message. Timothy was the most explicit user of our illicit service provided at the feral funeral parlour. He was not dissimilar to others in that he found a deep attraction to the dead’s pallor. However, Timothy was never satisfactorily relived with mere ogling or the careful caressing of corpses. No, his depths of depravity were whips, chains and the romping of remains.

 You may ask why I allow the desecration of dearly deceased Grandma. Well, if you are no longer living and lovely you won’t notice a thing anyway. The thought of a tibia bone making a teasing truncheon is too twisted for most to contemplate. Even the bible does not forbid this seductive sodomy as it is too repulsively repellent to rationalise.

 Timothy’s action after a modest transaction. 90-year-old female: all decomposed: ‘Quick! Off with the coffin pall!’ 6-year old male: freshly dead leukaemia sufferer: ‘Splendid to embed’. 23-year old female: decapitated car crash victim: ‘Kinky casualty’.

 I like to think we offer a sellers service to the lowest of earthly dwellers: repressing these bottled-up body-snatchers burdens the buried in being an unburied bike. Sex and death are intimately alike: both affect you and are next to you. Maybe inside of you too. The slapping of cerements is quite literally the fatal attraction.

 Everyone ends up in our hands. Dead. Cremation plans won’t spare you from funeral fondling. It won’t stop Timothy with a hellish hard-on from masturbating into your urn and making a sadistic stew out of your ashes and his cum.

Sunday, 5 January 2014

Colour blind America and The New Age of Liberal Racism

 It was Martin Luther King who famously said that people should be “judged on their content of their character and not the colour of their skin.” During this period stretching back to into times of slavery, the public domain was smeared with overt racist discourses and people were wrongly distinguished biologically according to ancestry. The landmark civil rights movements in the 1960’s brought an upheaval on racial perceptions.

 The concept of people being judged on their individual merits rather than wholly on race was born. Colour was no long a crucial difference justifying socially enforced segregation, instead it was sold as an attribute of little importance. Consequently, the most overt racism practiced became shamed and social egalitarianism gobbled it up. This concept promoted the idea that people are always equal which was deeply embedded in the dearly held beliefs of liberalism and individual rights. This ideology in principle is noble and initially led to untold positives stretching beyond the American borders. Many still passionately hold these beliefs and would fight for them. However, ironically, it has become a double-edged sword that modernly facilitates the majority’s interests by its institutional unwillingness to reaffirm long lasting inequalities.

 America is on the very fringes of the low-context and low-power cultural markers, which create a society obsessed with individualism. Consequently, it is why various group still viciously oppose state intrusion even for the collective greater good. Guns and the irrational reaction it provokes from various groups is an excellent example. It is also a cultural philosophy that enables them to rationalise racial problems on broader societal patterns from their microscopic focus on the individual.

 According to Chief Justice John Roberts, "The way to stop racism is to stop discriminating on the basis of race." However, racism in the 21st century is generally not perpetuated from overt individual attitudes, since the minority is protected vigorously under law, but it is the statistical facts in terms of incomes, housing, health and opportunities that can be categorised purely through race. Interestingly, present strategies cannot dismantle broader racist inequalities, and therefore the entire liberal philosophy on race no longer offers a suitable path to progress. Despite reaching the pinnacle of progress in individual rights the wealth gap in America between African American and White European American’s has tripled since 1980. Currently white employment post-credit crunch is 6% but African-American`s is standing over 13%.

The implementation of colour blindness into politics compounded with the myopic focus on the individual, has shushed the identified race disparity and allowed it to silently continue unchanged. The problem with blindness in pretending people of all groups are equal is that it functions on the assumption that the playing field is balanced when it evidently is not. It allows the perpetrators behind the policies, many whom are well meaning or vocal minorities themselves, to aggressively deny any trace of racism through no mention of race.

 Such political stoicism by turning race into a non-issue, which is contrary to the disturbing facts, can ultimately only favour those who hold an unfairly advantageous position through a lack of interference. Scientists universally deny biological difference between the so-called ‘races’, and therefore societal indifference cannot be attributed to genetics. However, it is proven by academics to still be an important element of identity and social classification.

If race is such a non-issue why has the topic of race gradually become taboo in which white majorities evade? Such taboo facilitates its omission meaning it cannot be understood and addressed sensibly, instead we simply try to pretend it doesn’t exist and therefore cannot come to terms with centuries of disadvantage from cultural, physical, economic and legal discrimination. Unfortunately this race ideology has become dominant in many of the western democracies, which indirectly enables racism through misattributing current racial problems.

Ultimately political irrelevance of race in America is a dead-end which selectively ignores the obvious sociological problems America suffers from. Progress will only be initiated further when the current journey of progress itself is challenged. The mere idea of this will no doubt be an affront to very foundations of the unshakable values many of you have been spoon-fed as ideological commonsense over the years. So, when will we start talking about race again?

Friday, 3 January 2014

Women are easy with a bit of wealth and power


Kulap says: hi 21 f Thailand here

Lord Misanthrope says: Greetings, peasant.

Kulap says: urs pls is?

Lord Misanthrope says: England. I'm currently looking for a wife from Thailand.

Kulap says: relly?

Lord Misanthrope says: Yes, I am sweet dear.

Kulap says: what is a lord?

Lord Misanthrope says: A Lord is an individual who has been granted with power, wealth and land by the King of England. I'm a proud owner of 3 castles, 6 estates, 150 loyal servants and 56 hookers.

Kulap says: how old r u?

Lord Misanthrope says: Sixty seven and quarter.

Kulap says: im only 21 but age no mater for me

Lord Misanthrope says: Yes, and you are seeking a rich husband?

Kulap says: yup

Kulap says: who r caring, loyal, respect an willing to support me and family thru hard times

Lord Misanthrope says: How convenient!

Lord Misanthrope says: Support in what way, peasant?

Kulap says: I come frm a poor family

Lord Misanthrope says: I am rich and would support you. My ancestors fought side by side with the Tudors during the War of The Roses (1455). My great ancestor, the Lord Protector James III, mobilised his army and defeated the Duke of Somerset at the battle of St Albans. Since that day the country has been in debt to his services and our family has been blessed with aristocratic riches at the expense of the tax payer for centuries.

Kulap says: watttt much writing there!!

Kulap says: my English no so good1!!!

Kulap says: but u do don't mind my age?

Lord Misanthrope says: 21 is a commendable age, my last wife was 16 when I disposed of her as she became too hairy.

Kulap says: U not with her??

Lord Misanthrope says: No, she was a terrible wife.

Lord Misanthrope says: She wouldn't even swallow.

Kulap says: am single

Lord Misanthrope says: Do you wish to marry me?

Kulap says: yes do u av a picc or cam

Lord Misanthrope says: Yes it's on my profile now.


Lord Misanthrope says: Excuse the women next to me there, thank god I executed her, damn my ex was fat.

Kulap says: ooooo am looking u r handsome

Lord Misanthrope says: Indeed I am.

Kulap says: cuttie

Lord Misanthrope says: Although admittedly I have this terrible scabbing condition which leaves a disgusting puss filled crust over a large portion of my wrinkly body, if you are to be my wife you'll have to file it off every morning.

Kulap says: What time is it there now?

Lord Misanthrope says: its 4 pm

Kulap says: I am 10 hours ahead!

Lord Misanthrope says: I see. How much specifically will your father require in monetary payment to buy you?

Kulap says: whtt????

Lord Misanthrope says: How much money does your family need?

Kulap says: nonono nooooo If I am to marry I want to support them, I will give work then all there needs and wants

Lord Misanthrope says: Work in what capacity? I do not understand, peasant.

Kulap says: any just to find and have money

Lord Misanthrope says: Are you saying that you wouldn't be needing my financial muscle to help your spear throwing family elevate themselves above the poverty line?

Kulap says: if we r getting married I only hope for ur help with family

Lord Misanthrope says: Selflessness and modesty are truly attractive traits. I would like to proceed with this transaction, when can we wed?

Kulap says: wed what is tht

Lord Misanthrope says: Wedding, i.e- getting married

Kulap says: I want to finish my studies here… by next year I would of finish

Lord Misanthrope says: I would prefer a quicker wedding.

Kulap says: wen?

Lord Misanthrope says: I choose castle Dunnottar in Scotland for our wedding location, it will be more than suitable. I would of chosen Cowney castle but unfortunately I believe it to be plague infested.

Kulap says: my parents would want to go

Lord Misanthrope says: That is fine, but do they know how to act in social situations around the Queen, Barack Obama and David Cameron?

Kulap says: I wish for a small wedding

Lord Misanthrope says: Yes, but I have many personal friends collectively called 'The Gang' who desire to attend: David Beckham, Tom Cruise, Elton John, Jimmy Saville, George Bush and Gary Glitter.

Kulap says: Bush??????????????

Kulap says: old president of US????

Lord Misanthrope says: Yes, he calls me Dear Uncle. I know his father, I did a few "backhand" business deals with him in the first Gulf war.

Kulap says: oo icc

Kulap says: im so so shy

Kulap says: I am only a poor girl...

Lord Misanthrope says: It's ok I will protect you, I'm a powerful and rich man. My motto is that I take from the poor and give to the rich.

Kulap says: thanks

Lord Misanthrope says: Will you get your father to organise the stag night?

Kulap says: stag night?????

Lord Misanthrope says: A stag night is where all the old chaps get together and go out for the last time – you know – drinking, drugs and underage Asian prostitutes.

Kulap says: ok I see, my english very  poor

Lord Misanthrope says: that isn't a problem my peasant wife. I must go now. Farewell.

Kulap says: wait do u want to se me on cam

Kulap says: I do dirty :)

Lord Misanthrope says: I will be back in 15 minutes to cyber mount you.

Sunday, 29 December 2013

The decline of freedom of speech in the UK





This is 19-year-old Adam Swelling, who after receiving a suspended sentence for assault went onto murder a father-of-3 Gary Lovewell. He was also apparently at the time on bail for other pending crimes. 





This 21-year-old, called Liam Stacy, who was jailed for 56 days for posting drunken racist tweets after the footballer Fabrice Muamba collapsed during an English F.A Cup football match. He first tweeted “LOL fuck Muamaba!! He’s dead!!” and then continued a barrage of race-related insults at the footballer and outraged members of the public as his tweets circulated. 


Around the same time, another idiot, Amzhar Ahmed, 20, was arrested for saying that all British soldiers should go to hell for sending grossly offensive communication.


Whilst insulting someone because of their “race” or career choice is indeed deplorable, it is madness that people risk prosecution, even jailed, because of the language they use on social networks because they crossed cultural taboo or cracked an insensitive joke. Frankly, society already incarcerates enough non-violent criminals. The police were not acquainted with either of the two defendants mentioned, Liam Stacy and Amzhar Ahmed, therefore, we can safely assume that they were no real threat to society. The same cannot be unfortunately said for Adam Swelling, who is one amongst an ocean of repeat violent offenders currently causing crime waves up and down the country, which the police have no real answer for. 


Words are not going to determine the result of an attempted revival after cardiac arrest, nor will words alone blow an airport into smithereens. Sometimes, in a so-called free society, we will hear views, opinions and rants that we don’t agree with or like. An affront to common decency is not sufficient to overturn freedom of speech. 


One of the interesting aspects to internet posting is the anonymity users feel because of the spatial distance technology creates in relation to their verbal target. Consequently, the false security offered through the internet encourages people to articulate nonsense which they wouldn’t usually in a shared  physical domain. The internet revolution has greatly exposed how poor freedom of speech is protected in the UK in this respect since the police decided to take it seriously whilst highlighting how easy it is for the police to initiate an investigation because vaguely written legislation that suits the state and overly sensitive complainants. It is quite unfortunate, even ironic, that the Leverson inquiry would happen around the same time of this erosion of freedom because of the News of The World scandal. It is already known that the UK suffers from the worst defamation laws in the civilised world, which has led to the phenomena of ‘libel tourism.’ Essentially, wealthy litigants worldwide can silence their critics and enforce censorship through the London courts regardless of truth. If you are rich, powerful and dislike criticism the UK will cater for you with Saudi style censorship!


The disturbing trend in which the British police arrest or investigate people because of insensitive remarks on the grounds of it being a ‘hate crime’, or by invoking some other obscure communication law in the event of a complaint, is truly disturbing. Lord Sugar was investigated recently for posting a picture of a crying Chinese child captioned with “The kid is upset because he was told off for leaving the product line of a iPhone5.” Although no action was formally taken against him, it was laughably documented officially as a hate crime



As a linguist I wonder where exactly the line needs to be drawn and what will lead to police investigations tomorrow? And how far reaching should press regulation really be? The preface to George Orwell’s Animal Farm is: “If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” Authoritarian regimes are well known for their airbrushing and selective management of a language via state intrusion. The Soviets were specialists at this and had agencies organised to maintain the standard of Russian being published. OK, so we aren’t quite there yet. Living in a democracy there will be no blanket authoritarian laws implemented like this, instead freedom of speech will be slowly whittled away. People will be funneled into conformity succumbing to whatever the latest euphemism is to not tread on toes, and police will act purely on the volume of complaints they received which is supported by the current laws.

In my opinion, the police in this country have become more ideologically motivated as they have slowly lost control of preventing tradition crimes through traditional means of patrolling. The government says every year that crime is dropping yet most people in reality feel less safe. Official crime statistics are likely dropping because the government recategorises crime and much minor crime now passes unreported. You only need to look at the number of sentences now containing diminished responsibility or manslaughter charges that impact murder statistics (...and vast medical advancements).

Surely there is a way of maturely opposing idiocy from the likes of Liam Stacy, or any other arsehole with a big mouth, without directly opposing freedom of speech? Judges should operate sentencing on the platform of the severity of the crime committed not act wholly on the levels of public offence caused. Such cases shouldn’t really even make it to the courtroom and need to be settled through common sense: open public dismissal and ridicule or allowing its quiet passing. However, this will not happen until various groups drop the ‘Freedom of speech BUT’ mentality.

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Britain set to increase support for French military operations in Mali



David Cameron today confirmed that hundreds of British troops will be sent to Mali and neighbouring countries to aid in training exercises as Britain launches itself into a greater support role for French troops.  This is set to include 40 senior military advisors, 200 British soldiers and logistical support to combat Islamic militants.

“I said I wouldn't deploy boots, therefore not to betray my political demeanour I’ve done the exact opposite.  It is a training mission, not a combat mission so we can pretend we aren't involved yet,” the Prime Minister stressed. “The lead on this will clearly be taken by the French, who have the greatest interest in rapidly training up west African forces to replace the French forces that are currently in action in Mali," he said downplaying the British role.

The decision to reinforce the French military is controversial amidst military cuts and growing poverty at home from the continuing economic downturn.  Despite the negativity David Cameron remained upbeat, “We have the military capability and the capacity even in difficult times of austerity. The budgets have been planned in advance, therefore I’ve told the Defence Secretary to book tickets for the troops to arrive in Mali via Ryan Air. Also personnel have received written letters ordering them to bring their own combat clothes that are suitable for outdoor conditions.”

The Prime Minister rubbished parallels between the militants in Libya in 2011 Western powers supported and those currently subjugating Mali. “We have a moral obligation in upholding peace and democracy worldwide. The militants we aided in Libya to topple the brutish Gaddafi were freedom-loving zealots.  However, the Islamic militants in Mali the French are embroiled in fighting with are evil fundamentalists. There is clearly a big difference.”

The Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, reinforced the Prime Ministers position when questioned about the absence of a British military aircraft carrier during times of unease. “There is no chance of the government blindly putting personnel in irresponsible danger.  Rapid deployment of the Royal Navy’s latest rubber dingy has been mobilised to support military operations.”

French-led forces are continuing their operations against militants in the north of the country after seizing Timbuktu yesterday securing the vital airport. 

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Hot Lesbians


Outside the local shop the following conversation ensued during barely-wanted eavesdropping:

“When we was passing town at the bus shelter, uhh, the other night,” said the baseball cap clad teenager.

“After Adam’s, was that?” Replied the second overgrown mass sitting on a child’s bicycle.

“….yeh, and there was these two men…. hugging!” replied the first.

“Hugging? That’s well gay, innit,” said the second.

 “Not natural them gays,” the teenager concurred. 

“I don’t mind those lessies though,” replied the second thoughtfully.

 “I love a lesbian, especially two for my cock,” both laughed in unison at the suggestion.

Business tends to market around the parameters of social acceptability of what sells.  Lesbian erotica has been tapped terrifically into the mainstream over the past decade; From the infamous Britney-Madonna smooches, to ‘Buffy The Vampire Slayer’, and ‘The L Word’.  Katie Perry’s ‘I Kissed a Girl’ became globally the largest selling single in 2008 selling 5 million copies.  It is difficult to envision the same merchandising effect if Robert Patterson staged a passionate kiss with Tom Cruise at the Golden Globes, although negative furore would furiously be invoked.  Undoubtedly lesbian relationships, at least those involving beautiful women, have become more favourable amongst modern society.

Heterosexual attitudes towards gay men and lesbians have also broadly shown to favour lesbians in national RDD surveys; 92% believed that a female-female relationship can be committed and loving, but only 71% believed male-male ones could be.  47.1% believed that lesbian couples should be allowed adoption rights, but only 33.3% for gay male couples.  The difference is quite horrifying when it is not an orientation issue but an individual one.

The U.S Department of Justice statistics in 2008 concluded that there were 9,691 victims of hate crimes in the United States reported to law enforcement agencies.  Analysis shows that involving sexuality:  57.5% were victims of an offender’s anti-male homosexual bias, whilst 11.6%were victims because of an anti-female homosexual bias.  It is noteworthy that this is only the reported surface.  To delve into the unreported: The Kaiser Family foundation carried out surveys in 2012, and found that gay men were much more likely to be the target of discrimination, men reported 82% compared to lesbians 62%.

This unequal bias is not restricted to ‘The West’.  Since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, there have been over 4000 executions involving homosexuality, and none are known to be female.  Iranian judges can invoke ‘prior knowledge’ where legal loopholes allow criminal convictions on the basis of little or no evidence.  Homosexuality suffers large levels of state-sponsored funding in Africa, and is still outlawed in 38 Africa countries.  Many convictions lead to lengthy prison sentences, and in some countries (Nigeria particularly) the death penalty.  Other countries, such as Ghana, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Mauritius, Seychelles, Lesotho, Malawi, Swaziland, Zimbabwe are either unclear on lesbian relationships or deliberately omit it from the penal code.  Although there are no official statistics available for Africa, the obvious conclusion is that it is men that generally suffer the brunt of state-discrimination.  

Why is there such a world-wide contrasting perception on this issue?

Naturally, it would be wrong to assume that lesbians always get an easier time on the abuse barometer than gay man. The deep-seated misconception of lascivious women innately needing a man for satisfaction (even with their orientation defies it) may be marketable in the West.  However, it has sprouted a uniquely female crime.  Ndumie Funda started a petition in 2011 to lobby the South African government to fight ‘corrective rapes’ on women.  This is a terminology that describes a heinous crime 520 women report suffering yearly in South Africa, one of the few African countries that liberalises homosexuality, often involving gang rape, on a women to ‘correct’ her. 

It is easy to conclude that because men are more sexually mobile cartoonish fantasies involving multiple female partners at once is of great interest.  Also the inaccurate image of all gay men as flamboyantly feminine mortifies the masculinity of some straight men (despite it being possible to adhere to masculine gender roles and be gay).  These stereotypes likely hold some degree of truth, but it is not an acceptable shut-shop settlement. 

The dictator Mugabe once described homosexuality as a foreign import describing them as "worse than dogs and pigs" and “un-African”.  On dissection this view ignores the history of homosexuality; human experiences are not time nor place confined.  It is probable that humanity originated in Africa, and that first homosexual relationship didn’t come long after this event in same area.  Homosexuality is equally spread from East to West, through black and white, and from believer and nonbeliever.  Much of the hard ‘anti-gay’ brigade, despite gay-rights also being exported from such countries now, stems from western countries that were adhering to archaic Abrahamic values.  Christian missionaries indoctrinated communities throughout the world by exposure to the Holy Scriptures (although Islam is now becoming rampant in those countries presently overwriting any recent progress with the same medieval manacles). 

Homosexuality has a colourful history and expression stretching from classical antiquity.  In ancient Greece mature older men acceptably indulged into intercrural relationships with younger men whilst coinciding in a traditional marital marriage.  It was celebrated in art and literature in China throughout the Song, Ming and Qing dynasties stretching over a thousand years without prejudice.  In Papua New Guinea, some tribes believed homosexuality to be an integral part of culture and viewed heterosexuality as sinful but necessary.  Despite Islam and Christianity persecuting homosexuals it has been wild and widespread but wordless.  

Relationships involving women with the same sex does not have this historical depth or at least the limelight.  Femininity is not whittled by same-sex affection. This is not to say such relationships and suffering did not happen, but was not overtly recognised on the radar.  Even within the passages of Leviticus 18:22 the emphasis is on men. This lack of emphasis (or omission) could be from scriptural piety and importantly the lack of anal penetration perceived in lesbian relationships.  Either way it has not been taken as seriously and the greater punishment is on the man. Indeed, women in many societies have been sexual subordinates and the rise such open expression is a modern phenomenon.  Men with men is on our perverse minds.  However, the lighter attitude towards lesbians now that is invoked to attention has trivialised it as a playful and sexy ratings booster.

The parallel paths of both same-sex relationships fork to the same cessation; clone organs promenaded to zero productivity.  Ultimately it is unwise to stipulate that either of these relationships are disadvantageous in fulfilment compared to their heterosexual counterparts and to argue so is ignoring historical occurrences again and again regardless of current societal values. 

 Anyway, I decided to rewrite Katie Perry’s song. I await the day this becomes number one. Meanwhile, we can laugh at our hypocrisy.  

I kissed a boy and I liked it (Katie Perry Remix)

This was never the way I planned,

 Not my intention.

 I got so brave, dick in hand,

 Lost my discretion.

 It's not what, I'm used to.

 Just wanna try pink on.

 I'm curious for you,

 Caught my attention.


I kissed a boy and I liked it

 The taste of his cherry chapstick

 I kissed a boy just to try it

 I hope my daddy don’t mind it

 It felt so wrong.

 It felt so right.

 Don't mean I'm in love tonight.

 I kissed a boy and I liked it,

 I liked it.


No, I don't even know your name,

AIDS don’t matter.

You're my experimental game,

 Just human nature.

It's not what,

Good priests do,

 But it’s how they like to behave.

 My head gets so confused,

 Hard to obey.


I kissed a boy and I liked it.

 The taste of his cherry chap stick.

 I kissed a boy just to try it.

 I hope my daddy don't mind it.

 It felt so wrong.

 It felt so right.

 Don't mean I'm in love tonight.

 I kissed a boy and I liked it,

 I liked it.


Us boys we are so magical.

 Soft touch, six packs, so kissable

 Hard to resist so touchable.

 Too good to deny it.

 Ain't no big deal, it's natural.


I kissed a boy and I liked it.

 The taste of his cherry chap stick.

 I kissed a boy just to try it.

 I hope my daddy don't mind it.

 It felt so wrong,

 It felt so right.

 Don't mean I'm in love tonight.

 I kissed a boy and I liked it

 I liked it.